« Don't Believe All You Read In The Magazines | Main | Setting Yourself Up To Win »
Sunday
May242009

Salt It Up

Hello all,

People are always so shocked when I break out my salt shaker (like Mary Poppins and her umbrella and coat rack). You see, I absolutely love salt and I put it on everything.

Now before you start lecturing me about high blood pressure and how unhealthy salting my food is, I'm going to let you in on a little secret: Salt is good for you! Woohoo, salt it up baby!

People freak out on me when they see how much salt I use and then freak out even more when I tell them they MUST have salt as part of their healthy eating plan.

Here are the real facts (not to mention good news for saltaholics everywhere).

The human body cannot survive without salt (which is why you get a saline drip when you are in the hospital). Sodium is an essential nutrient that your body can't manufacture on its own, therefore it must be consumed.

Here's the problem. Most people are eating the wrong kind of salt. The only way to receive all the benefits of salt is to eat unrefined sea salt, NOT processed table salt.

The reason why salt has gotten such a bad reputation is because 99% of the world's salt research has been done on commercial table salt, the only salt most people know about (which is bad, bad, bad). Some of the best scientific research on the healthy properties of unrefined sea salt are written in French, German and Portuguese and many Brits and Americans have not been exposed to them (until now).

Well, not anymore. Unrefined sea salt has worked its magic on many of my clients, and, not to mention, ME.

When you consider that sea salt aids in balancing blood sugar levels, is needed for the absorption of food particles through the intestinal tract, can help prevent muscle cramps, is needed to make bones strong, regulates and normalizes blood pressure, increases energy levels, helps regulate the metabolism, helps maintain proper electrolyte balance, and supports the immune system., how could you not use it?

What salt should you buy?

Look for unprocessed, unrefined sea salt. Any unprocessed, unrefined brand is great but be careful though, if it doesn't mention unprocessed & unrefined assume it is not.

Oh, and of course, avoid refined white table salt at all costs (unless you want high blood pressure for some reason). This is the kind of salt we want to avoid like the plague.

So the next time someone tells you to take it easy on the salt, tell them "Salt it up, baby. It's good for you and you're really missing out."

Please refer to a news letter I sent out last year….when will the world catch up???!...

This dietary advice should be taken with a grain of salt

We may no longer spend our weekends watching witches being ducked, but we still seem to need demons to vilify. Ageing crones with crooked noses have been replaced by multinational industries, hell‑bent on doing us harm with everything from radioactive waste to dodgy silicone implants.

The latest hate figure is the global food industry, whose brews and potions are widely held to have turned millions of us into lard mountains. Fortunately, we can count on the Government's armies of “Witchfinders General” to protect us from the forces of evil, and last week one of its most diligent agents, the Food Standards Agency, scored a victory over that cabal of mass poisoners known as the Salt Manufacturers' Association.

The trade organisation had complained about a television advertising campaign that ran last autumn aimed at persuade us to reduce our intake of salt. Featuring a character called Sid the Slug, the FSA’s advertisements warned that high blood pressure, heart disease and strokes had been linked to the consumption of too much salt, with Sid yelling that "too much salt can lead to a heart attack!". The SMA complained to the Advertising Standards Authority that the campaign was at best meaningless and at worst highly misleading, as it implied that salt was necessarily bad for health and should be reduced.

Well, the SMA would say that, wouldn’t it? As the ASA made clear in its adjudication rejecting the complaint, there is a wealth of scientific evidence showing that high salt intake poses a serious risk to cardiac health. So who could possibly argue with the central message that we should all cut down on salt?

Pretty well anyone who has read the scientific literature, which reveals this argument to be a nonsequitur­ and a potentially dangerous one. A high‑salt diet has indeed been linked to high blood pressure, increased arterial thickness, strokes and increased severity of cardiac failure. Yet as the SMA pointed out, what does "high' actually mean? Certainly the evidence that most ordinary people will get any benefit from reducing salt intake is far from compelling.

In 2003, the British Medical journal carried out a review of studies into the long‑term effects of reduced salt intake among both ordinary people, and those with high blood pressure. The researchers identified a dozen studies that followed patients on reduced salt diets for up to seven years.

Overall, the results showed that a low‑salt diet did have some effect on blood pressure. It amounted to just one millimetre of mercury ‑ well below levels regarded as clinically significant, not least because most family doctors' blood pressure monitors can't measure to that precision. As for differences in death rates or heart attack rates, none was found ‑ despite the fact that the reduced salt regimes were far more draconian than even the FSA would impose on us. The researchers concluded that official efforts to persuade us to cut down on salt would produce small reductions in individual risk, though when multiplied across the whole nation, the total effect might be worth having.

More significant, however, were their caveats even on this feeble support for the official line. The researchers pointed out that increased blood pressure is only one risk factor for cardiovascular disease in any case; adding that "overall clinical benefits [or harms] of a low sodium diet are unclear".

In other words, not only is there little evidence that cutting salt will bring health benefits, it is even possible that it could do more harm than good. Salt is a source of sodium, which is critical to the functioning of living cells. Inadequate levels of sodium ‑hyponatremia ‑ produce a host of potentially life-threatening effects including confusion, fatigue seizures, coma and death.

It is recognised as a problem for the very old and the very young and is a leading cause of death among marathon runners ‑ who drink so much water that they dilute their sodium to lethal levels. The long‑term effect of attempts to persuade us all to cut our intake of this vital element are a mystery. In the absence of any large-scale scientific studies, there is simply no good scientific evidence to confirm that the benefits exceed the risks.

This is especially worrying given that the anti‑salt campaign appears to be working. According to a recent FSA survey, about 45 per cent of us are actively trying to cut down on salt. Fortunately, the Government has yet to introduce measures to force us to comply with this latest decree on public health. Until some decent evidence emerges for the benefits of bland, salt-­free food, claims to the contrary should be taken cum grano salis.

In health and happiness

Adrian Lowther

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>